[Listening to: Evanescence - Hello (Demos 2001-2002) - Evanescence - Demos 2001-2002 (03:34)]

There ia a time and place for everything. A choice to be made every time.

Guess what? You were never wrong.

You chose what you had to do, because 'it seems like a good idea at the time'.

A perfect world is a place where you would be able to make the right decisions every time, the first time since perfect symmetry exist between the choice and the information given. And of course, you would have ample time to digest the information, synthesize the appropriate action and prepare for any other contingencies that may arise. But we donot have that luxuries, if ever. We based our decisions on imperfect, asymmetrical information that we neither could confirm right away, or are n factor nth level data. Sometimes the decision must be made on that second, or could possibly stretch on for years. And in that moment, opportunity (and risk) will never wait for you.

So what do you do? Do you take a leap of faith or make a calculated risk-averse decision?

You're never wrong. And in that respect, no one could blame you. 99.5 percent of the time, 99.5 percent of the human population would make the same choice given your specific genetic/social/cultural heritage, position, background, information, planetary/celestial alignment and neural electrons discharge. But there is a 'systemic anomaly' in tha formula. Even if you lessen the degree of error, by supplying a closer/nearer amount to 1 (a certainty) and multiplying it with the same value, you would get a higher percentage of 'systemic anomaly'. That smaller probabitlity of occuruence grews larger with each iteration of multiplication. And it would take an infinite number of multiplication for that 'anomaly to reach a near perfect '0' or in other words, nil. If the human population ever grew to such large proportion, or regenerates through enough iterations, that 'anomaly' could be achieved.

What do you if you were that anomaly? You would probably do what anomaly does best: a proof that that scientifc model is not an accurate model of reality. What are the chances of you being that anomaly? Astronomical, but it is possible. Do you make the obviously blaring decision everybody makes, or do you cause a paradox or shift in reality? Conciusness? Predetermination? Causility? GOD? Chaos?

No one knows, that's the beauty of our 'reality'.

We are an experiment, most will go 'wrong', but one in possibly infinite number of experiments will definitely succeed.

We blunder, we destroy, we build, we die, we gave birth. We are the universe discovering itself, reinventing as we go along.

In short, we are the 'in betweens'.

0's and 1's. The definitive maybe.